Subject: Re: detecting two SATA masters?
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/08/2005 10:38:33
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:15:48AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> >I see the word "jumper" down there. I don't think software is setting it,
> >just that some backup software was able to deal with a mis-configured ATA
> >Also, SATA doesn't have "master" and "slave". SATA is a point-to-point
> >serial interface. There is only one drive per channel in SATA, and thus
> >no notion of "master" and "slave".
> I may have mixed that up and it may have been old-school ATA.
> The point was to detect (in software) if there's wrong in hardware.
I think it really depends on how drives reacts. In general, I think there
would be errors reported by the kernel, such as commands timeout or DMA
errors. But I can also see (especially with PIO commands) how both drives
could accept and process the command without errors. If it's a write you write
the same data to both drives, if it's a read you get a logical or of both
Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference