Alan Ritter wrote:

>
>Oh, I just noticed that 0x00057fd4 is the same value that's ending up in
>the program counter after the jump.  So it must be dereferancing memory at
>that address, and jumping there?  Perhaps some initalization code should
>have put a valid address here earlier.  Sory to bother you if this is the
>case...
>
>  
>
Bingo. You need to figure why that address doesn't contain the right 
value. I'm not sure where it is, is it in the object code that was 
loaded? If so, maybe the address wasn't fixed up properly.

- Frank