Subject: Re: tmpfs: Internal representation of data
To: Matthew Orgass <darkstar@city-net.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/19/2005 17:31:53
--ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:30:31PM -0400, Matthew Orgass wrote:
> On 2005-07-19 matt@3am-software.com wrote:
>=20
> > One thing you may want to consider is that eventually that the tmpfs
> > maybe replace the current md-root mechanism but using an external tool
> > to write a tmpfs into a kernel.
>=20
> Consider also the possibility of designing tmpfs such that it can
> survive reboots (either battery backed RAM, or soft reset on a system that
> doesn't clear memory). This could make it more complex than desired
> (particularly the abililty to survive interrupted activity), but would at
> least be a point of comparison.
Let's save that idea for next summer's SoC project. :-)
My concern is that if we add the ability to survive reboots, then we=20
really aren't talking about a "temporary" file system. While someone can=20
look into this later, I think that'd be a lot of work. Among other things,=
=20
one of my hopes was that we would use kernel pageable memory, so some of=20
tempfs's data will be in the swap partitions. Making swap survive reboot=20
(and still be usable as swap, as opposed to being used to store a kernel=20
core dump for a little bit) strikes me as a sizable task in its own right.
Take care,
Bill
--ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFC3Zt4Wz+3JHUci9cRAvYNAJ0QF2PhE4J1jRIXm5cxyGSCBrkG1ACfbQVO
GS/z/IC5O5TaVHYCWlfp0CY=
=ix8p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ--