thanks for commiting the bulk of this.

   On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, matthew green wrote:
   > i don't want "vnconfig" to ever be removed.  i don't see any point.
   
   The point is consistence between vnd(4), vndconfig(8) and vndcompress(1, 
   not yet committed).
   
   But as this is aparently such a big problem, i'll put that down on the 
   list now... seems NetBSD isn't about doing things the right way any more.


why isn't it wrong to remove a binary that people have used for over
10 years?  what *harm* is there in leaving the old name?  how is it
confusing?