--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hiya Quentin,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 12:15:33AM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> See for yourself with the attached patch for execve(2).
> 
> There might be smarter ways of doing this, I'm open to suggestions.  But
> keep in mind that we want to avoid as much as possible duplicating code,
> but not at the expense of the native syscall's speed.

Looks very good to me; i wonder why it wasn't implemented in this way in 
the first place for it comes to me as very logical and sane. Maybe to 
prevent breakage they first went out and patched the copy with the plan to 
later merge the two routines back again, only that enver happened?

Cheers,
Reinoud

--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQtJOlIKcNwBDyKpoAQKYTgf9ECG0O46UOoS7UMeLSLqRPAKaMtJn5ils
hDjuqLRou0WiK8eNhdpb8haCtaRfHGghvdmu1ajBOsASmT+TZok2Vpb0Jhd7RVGO
F2bDYbnRNH+paiojA/tuCyFhvxNv1L4GszIWnF3t51hJAY226SgOiIbjlGqnR/AY
pJkQo55N+KlAUZoaTXdKUZkpnM4LQUkVe3LWdZY+VylegT4sv3akVN5UR0tfA4b/
He0flFxTul3DfJs8+P8GMUGyJy2lLNm9n2+YojUft7dx41Kng83Z62gK7ABVUd9n
Q5eqCesvOWMZaDZzsay7nVrjPolyvTkM9nDNtkGhhoicNA21TJ9s0Q==
=QBSC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--