--QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:29:21PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> >The vnode locks needed for getcwd() certainly _ought_ to be MP-safe,
> >no?  What's the point of having them there if they aren't?
> 
> I don't believe for a moment that the VFS locking "protocol" is  
> actually MP-safe.

Maybe a good reason the more to overhaul VFS locking `protocol' / cleaning 
up namei calls.... though i am NOT voluntering for this.

(ducks away)

Reinoud


--QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQr890oKcNwBDyKpoAQKmwAgAvg7m+J6wfx1pAL8KnY6Nc4dWwNq2wJDl
JL0qfzrv6t1ysyCXaFul+aKPsXai/i6hqCDrDOTd924gW4sdLdN1Y/+09l1PVB7V
cp5oM61du/zRaqjnBtQLdULzfugXXWjOKR2rFHZ8fDjB/BHdDGkgPOVaXhXqP7jg
tQdNxFC1CnhIEWh0naWzW7CRyBT/cCm1s5KqNwUtjeDb7h9JuApeozWphRN1OTny
7lkM01g6LjhCDwUgcfWfpiyE8FjwQGovObD7kFvl3kGSVCC65j8oMmVS8Q1MP8K9
LVfEktf8uXw67JR7FnC4a95jvjQlWfK5vsqrpDlFJxl410jWPmZzFA==
=jJm5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/--