Subject: Re: DRI [was: Re: more summer of code fun]
To: Tonnerre <tonnerre@thundrix.ch>
From: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/24/2005 20:38:04
--Signature_Fri__24_Jun_2005_20_38_04_-0400_lTTU5YhQNrnuuTQB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
> Oh yes, and we should never assume that something will be rejected as
> prior art until a court decided so, there have been several patent
> lawsuits already that failed even though to one of us the patent claim
> would have been pretty obviously subject to prior art.
Ok, that's true.
> Also, a counter-claim for prior art is not gratis, so it's an open
> question who would pay for all those lawsuits.
Also true. But this specific patent would affect enough big firms to
(likely) invalidate the patent. ( provided it is what we think it is,
I'm far from being a patent lawyer )
> Anyway, even though this does affect NetBSD code, people might not be
> happy with having us discuss it on tech-kern, so I wonder whether we
> should open up a separate mailing list for patent issues or something
> like that concerning NetBSD.
I guess some admin will do this if it annoys enough people ;)
( but you're right, it's not quite appropriate for tech-kern, especially
not for tech-x11 )=20
have fun
Michael
--Signature_Fri__24_Jun_2005_20_38_04_-0400_lTTU5YhQNrnuuTQB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBQrynbMpnzkX8Yg2nAQKqzggAoD2uUxkmQc/MDOGdvvwwhiwhPtoWk5xx
wiHpwuBEZaAXm9fjasd8aqJgWr9zvdPVp9X0s8ZtNUGxPbOXUoc7Ep1RGkeXgqnJ
a7p4V2QIl88sjf0k517DfWqjoli2JUiAcLlnQjQf95qhZ21tUEB6I9HWb7t+vILz
iWi3tLU0E/eBzGGlZDbKVlsln0rleHJJh/7xdqoSwSz7OCOThe7Lgcw3UO8FJuYE
vc4dsfW1mu8ZkxgBHch+/7hQ/SQTncZ2SxRNIBuU3/APww/9lTXlmtbM6He+6g4P
MxXtz0xqmZjUMR0ejGEmeDvuiDlBRCAXBm7Pv+EJzzjY28y2+bmH0g==
=bRqc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature_Fri__24_Jun_2005_20_38_04_-0400_lTTU5YhQNrnuuTQB--