On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Hubert Feyrer wrote:

>> Perhaps "clcompress" is suitable?
>
> Sure not two programs, at best we can make it regard argv[0].
> What do you think about "vncompress", as this is really a vnd-thing, not a 
> cloop (== linux' name) thing?
>
>
> - Hubert

OK, that's a good name!

(Although, remember, we're 100% compatible, so our newly created files 
should also work on Linux right out of the box).

-Flo