Subject: Re: changing default for UFS_DIRHASH and NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY
To: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/04/2005 09:57:55
--xPLL5cPndR2UZ7Mw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 09:53:18AM +1000, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> All of this relates to performance and suitability; all these options
> seem stable to me, but I think the current defaults are correct.
Except that I agree about changing NEW_BUFQ examples to the correct name.
--
Dan.
--xPLL5cPndR2UZ7Mw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFCoO6DEAVxvV4N66cRAucXAJ90pA7LzyfJPeUd5/njIN3M0BR2HQCg6yEr
fbN/5m0lc/BVowHiE/dKHZs=
=3ZJE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--xPLL5cPndR2UZ7Mw--