Subject: Re: splx() optimization [was Re: SMP re-eetrancy in "bottom half"
To: None <ups@tree.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/03/2005 11:31:18
> > >i have objection if you implies global IPLs.
> > >(like your original proposal in 2003)
> > 
> > 
> > Now that leaves me confused! I thought what Bill outlines is, in
> > essence, what I proposed in late 2003. Yamamoto-san, do they sound
> > like the same thing to you? Do we have a consensus for it (or for one
> > or other, if they are different)?
> 
> Global as in contrast to per CPU?
> I think we all agree that we want per CPU. Right?
> Do you have a link handy to your 2003 proposal? 

http://mail-index.NetBSD.org/tech-kern/2003/12/17/0049.html

while i want per CPU of course,
i'm not really sure we all agree with it. :(

YAMAMOTO Takashi