Subject: Re: rasops "attr"
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
From: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/23/2005 14:29:02
--Signature_Mon__23_May_2005_14_29_02_-0400_jjJsvr9BXB8GwrDp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
> > > Well, isn't wchar_t 32-bits on most architectures (36 on pdp10)? :-)
> >=20
> > umm... for some reason I assumed they were 16 bit. I'm pretty sure on NT
> > they are. Anyway - do we need more than 16bit per character?
>=20
> I'm not sure. But we have the whole wchar_t issue because we thought we=20
> would never need more than 8 bits, so it makes sense to choose something=
=20
> such that we will never need wwchar_t... :-)
True. 32bit should be safe for a while...
have fun
Michael
--Signature_Mon__23_May_2005_14_29_02_-0400_jjJsvr9BXB8GwrDp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBQpIg7spnzkX8Yg2nAQJzdAgAuEEuldmk9QQ5fjxQNq/YXG1qv99bnLJn
N45Hy5O+66YNQ9G8BU/tp1vvgD9hM5E166jndHyOMrLZKItPM0kJrpAzFhxsOCuM
/onAaA256AD/1daMAI1qsgE1PsfbngDYq/SluCRwYYvs9fs8JnZKi2PEOhVY1YWP
AXT6RLWCAfQhMeEeu3P8LTlQFSaaPWordHPCrsZ7Ygv9tgr+Q6V8PPsNIuAUWZAh
U85w0+wx4067NbjE3IRkCFAWMWMrO/DBQv2/6CB6wM4MSVsQ3uXIvhQ6/RqgIeKf
4eAjXXn02XzhLyHLaZzb8AM+hHKQTEK2x3wc/eGke+1Y3QatolgtXw==
=ffGy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature_Mon__23_May_2005_14_29_02_-0400_jjJsvr9BXB8GwrDp--