Subject: Re: rasops "attr"
To: Michael <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
Date: 05/23/2005 11:17:21
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:39:17PM -0400, Michael wrote:
> > Well, isn't wchar_t 32-bits on most architectures (36 on pdp10)? :-)
> umm... for some reason I assumed they were 16 bit. I'm pretty sure on NT
> they are. Anyway - do we need more than 16bit per character?
I'm not sure. But we have the whole wchar_t issue because we thought we=20
would never need more than 8 bits, so it makes sense to choose something=20
such that we will never need wwchar_t... :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----