Subject: Re: rasops "attr"
To: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/23/2005 11:17:21
--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:39:17PM -0400, Michael wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> > Well, isn't wchar_t 32-bits on most architectures (36 on pdp10)? :-)
>=20
> umm... for some reason I assumed they were 16 bit. I'm pretty sure on NT
> they are. Anyway - do we need more than 16bit per character?
I'm not sure. But we have the whole wchar_t issue because we thought we=20
would never need more than 8 bits, so it makes sense to choose something=20
such that we will never need wwchar_t... :-)
Take care,
Bill
--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFCkh4xWz+3JHUci9cRAjINAJ4v0d25pOUkOyuejjkJIHBvtezyoQCfUGXM
k4KHTjCN6KyBIhu184QOkr8=
=e5dz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef--