Subject: Re: raidframe, cgd and parity errors
To: Eric Haszlakiewicz <email@example.com>
From: Roland Dowdeswell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/08/2005 20:13:39
On 1115588344 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch
Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> Don't the shutdown hooks get run in the reverse order that they are
>established? If so, then the shutdown hook for the later device (say a
>vnd) would run before the one for the earlier device/operation (e.g. the cgd
>that the vnd is on, and the mount operation for the filesystem on the cgd.)
>and everything should unwind correctly. No?
Hmmm, yes. This works. When do file systems get unmounted and
how does this affect something like:
Does this pose problems that we'll need to solve?
It might be worse to consider raid on cgd on vnd on ffs. The raid's
shutdown hooks will be run [potentially?] after the ffs is unmounted.
Roland Dowdeswell http://www.Imrryr.ORG/~elric/