--- Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:58:43AM -0400, der
> Mouse wrote:
> >> The time it takes to fsck a "big disk" now is
> approximately the time it
> >> took to fsck a "big disk" 10 years ago, and
> approximately the time it
> >> took to fsck a "big disk" 20 years ago: relevant
> speeds have kept a
> >> remarkably even pace with storage density.
> >
> > Yes, but this time is probably less acceptable now
> than it was 10 or 20 years
> > ago.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> fsck on   NetBSD: ~forever.
> fsck on  !NetBSD: 0
> winnner: !NetBSD
> loser:    NetBSD
> 
> Hate me for being negative. :)
WinFs of Microsoft proposes interesting
functionalities (management of several formats of
files, persistence extended, multi-media...) that can
be beneficial for the future development of FFS (well
on, one does not need that it affects the principles
of the NetBSD project), except the fact that WinFS
rests on SQLServer.

thank you

kamel 

NetBSD is very JIHBED

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com