Subject: Re: Hard realtime scheduling
To: Joerg Sonnenberger <email@example.com>
From: SODA Noriyuki <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/05/2005 17:12:22
>>>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:01:49 +0200,
Joerg Sonnenberger <email@example.com> said:
> You should differentiate between RT scheduling and CPU usage. It makes
> sense to support bounded notification times after an event occured
> (e.g. new audio data, part of a buffer written for cdrecord, etc.).
Or, it may make sense to give some rate of CPU time to certain
processes, even without a RT event.