Subject: Re: fixing send(2) semantics (kern/29750)
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/27/2005 00:04:01
On Mar 26, 2005, at 11:04 PM, der Mouse wrote:

>> You get ENOBUFS, which SUS says you should not get with blocking I/O.
>>
>
> Yes, I think this needs fixing.  But pushing blocking behaviour  
> down to
> the link layer does not sound to me like the right way to fix it.

I used to think this (even just 5 minutes ago), but I no longer do.   
It is the documented behavior!

-- thorpej