--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:12:32PM +0100, Jachym Holecek wrote:
> I wonder why fixed point rationals aren't enough for you...? You could
> even get more precision out of them.

I've decided to go with fixed point.  I was just a little disappointed that
I couldn't use floats.  I guess I lost sight of the fact that this is
kernel stuff and you can't expect the normal userland C stuff to `just work=
'.

Thanks for the advice, everyone!

Regards,
Peter
--=20
http://www.student.kun.nl/peter.bex
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
							-- Donald Knuth

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCHjyCLg33BXzVMqsRAt9UAJ9nN4F+Ddf5SOlJDC2FnsdSEAnrHACfSUgP
MX6ncRf1Jr4oPsgnXj5HItI=
=2sXk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--