Subject: Re: Anyone working on ATA over Ethernet?
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/15/2005 10:04:53
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Gordon Waidhofer wrote:
> iSCSI appears a toy. So does SATA. So did SCSI at one time.
> The toys will win.
Well, it was the Small Computer System Interface, I think...
But if iSCSI is seen as a wide area transport, don't forget the cost
of either secured seperate cabling, or IPSec at both ends...
At least, with iSCSI there is this option. With ATA over raw Ethernet,
I'm not aware of such a solution (unless you count using an encrypted
disk layer like cgd on top of that, which doesn't solve all the=20
problems).
Regards,
-is
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQEVAgUBQhG7MTCn4om+4LhpAQGD5wgAjKWR4wLSyFeHYem/JBv4Td0FsYQzbvwd
F+dMiV6UpCqEn8ZdJbULSb0IPjt1gs/Pu7zAD4fGgZ87R1odPqtutdAszThG5Ugs
4ZDVIzd6yQ8TRdFgWhSyz0CpNC/eGF0yZbL5eSulK8RA+TlFWxKN9HtIAW725mCo
LkrSOnPm5B1QXFot5ARl7l0LhIrwUKTvpOkJFjIYmdrHc5pXLrz8QmbUg96eMhYw
tcvZteTncsawYrpp5iVG884JLxXlyMdQjn5rYJ6cdvK1A5H3MvBYoj3cp1cmqjns
yJmatGwxXnJiLoczb57I3gG75DjK7PA+dwx0TZSeodC7yBI6fvnSaA==
=79R3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--