Subject: Re: IOCTL implementation and kernel/userland addresses
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/14/2005 19:50:31 
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:45:57AM -0800, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> Ahh, I was mistakenly thinking that ltsleep wants the proc pointer, and 
> thus NULL would have problems. As it doesn't, we should be fine.

Still we could use the proc pointer to know if it's safe to sleep
or not ...

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--