Subject: Re: IOCTL implementation and kernel/userland addresses
To: None <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/14/2005 12:51:07
> > > > Would proc still be NULL if the IOCTL is called from a kernel thread ?
> > >
> > > We're making the semantics of such a call up as we go along. However I
> > > think that passing proc == NULL if the secondary addresses are in kernel
> > > space is reasonable.
> >
> > Won't this cause problems if the ioctl wants to sleep ?
>
> Hmm.... Yes.
what's a problem if it sleeps?
YAMAMOTO Takashi