On Feb 9, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Jachym Holecek wrote:

> One other question: would it be acceptable for drvctl to be compiled
> unconditionally? Currently, it is subject to "pseudo-device". I'm not
> sure how to ellegantly support keeping it optional.

I don't think it should be optional.

In any case, even if it is, the infrastructure calls that drivers / 
busses would make could always be present in subr_autoconf.c

BTW, I think that only busses (i.e. things that attach children) should 
be sending the notifications.  That way only one place needs to deal 
with attach, detach, and not-configured type notifications (busses, not 
busses and drivers).

-- thorpej