Subject: Re: devd-alike for NetBSD
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
From: Jachym Holecek <freza@liberouter.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/09/2005 22:50:54
> > [... devd inconsistent with locnames ...]
> >
> >(look at the difference: config vs configuration and iface vs
> >interface.)
> >If text-form is finally approved, could this be made consistent,
> >please?
>
> I agree that text-form should be used, and that the bus's locnames
> should be used whenever possible. Obviously, PNP info does not always
> have a locname (USB might be the only one that does?)
Ok.
One other question: would it be acceptable for drvctl to be compiled
unconditionally? Currently, it is subject to "pseudo-device". I'm not
sure how to ellegantly support keeping it optional.
Regards,
-- Jachym Holecek