Hello,

> Hmm, they basically dump "struct device" as it seems. They are unable to
> pass any PNP information about the device, which limits usability I think.
> With this approach, it could end up like:
> 
> 	struct dvannounce {
> 		char 		name[...];
> 		...
> 		union {
> 			struct pci_attach_args 		pci;
> 			struct pcmcia_attach_args 	pcmcia;
> 			struct usb_attach_args 		usb;
> 			...
> 		};
> 	};
> 
> That seems less extensible and more fragile then textual format. Plus
> the demon would need to be updated every time you added a new bus...

Would passing the struct cfdata (with all the arrays and strings like
*cf_name and *cf_loc) instead of all the attach_args work?

Bye	Pavel