Subject: Re: COMPAT_IBCS2, SCO OSR5 executables SEGV on NetBSD 2.0
To: None <>
From: Ben Harris <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/29/2004 23:44:13
In article <> you write:
>Viewed that way, I think SCO_SIGNATURE should match, no?  I mean, the
>section is longer than the signature, but the test only seems concerned with
>the first sizeof(signature)-1 bytes anyway, and there they are.
>Am I missing something?

No.  I was missing the fact that '\14' == 0x0c.  Sorry.

Ben Harris                                                   <>
Portmaster, NetBSD/acorn26           <URL:>