Subject: Re: fsck still happens with softdeps?
To: Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <email@example.com>
Date: 12/22/2004 10:24:07
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:17:17PM +0100, Juan RP wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:57:33 +0100
> Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@student.kun.nl> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I just read McKusick's softdeps paper and if I understood it correctly,
> > fscks aren't necessary anymore except for the occasional background fsck
> > to reclaim lost inodes.
> Background fsck hasn't been implemented on NetBSD, this could be implemented
> now we have fss(4) with read/write support... any volunteer? :-)
fss(4) really doesn't have anything to do with it.
Thor Lancelot Simon firstname.lastname@example.org
"The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be
abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam Chomsky