Subject: Re: lib/28700: Re: lib/28700: pthread_cond_timedwait() hang with "zero" absolute time
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 12/20/2004 22:50:37
In article <20041220213706.GC1008@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:45:16AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> On Dec 20, 4:58am, email@example.com ("Charles M. Hannum") wrote:
>> -- Subject: Re: lib/28700: Re: lib/28700: pthread_cond_timedwait() hang with
>> | This sort of problem has been discussed before, and your patch is
>> | The problem is that there are many places that use
>> | for some of them it is simply wrong (and might even cause minor
>> | to round up. There needs to be both "round up" and "round down" behavior,
>> | used appropriately.
>> So the best thing would be to change the whole kernel to use timespec
>> internally everywhere. I will work on that.
>Or a 64bit microsecond counter?
You need nanoseconds for timespec and that is the source of the