Subject: Re: Kernel security
To: kamel derouiche <email@example.com>
From: Pavel Cahyna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/19/2004 19:00:35
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:27:37 +0000, kamel derouiche wrote:
> -OpenBSD supports a sight of hardening of the system (ProPolice, W^X,
> -FreeBSD has a tendency to concentrate on architectural solutions( PAM,
> TrustedBSD, Jail !!!, syncache...)
> which is the policy of safety of NetBSD in all that ??
You may find the 2.0 Release announcement at
http://www.netbsd.org/Releases/formal-2.0/ interesting. Especially search
for "systrace", "verified exec", "cryptographic disk", and "non-executable
mappings" (which is the same as W^X, I believe).