Subject: Re: Moving ethfoo in the main tree
To: Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/14/2004 07:32:33
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Dec 13, 2004, at 6:58 AM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> I was also thinking about adding a link2 flag to tun(4) to turn on
> emulation. I don't know how this would play with the ethernet layer.
> I think an ethernet device needs to be registered here at creation
> and can't be attached/detached from the ethernet layer at a later time.
> But I didn't look deeply at this.
How about using ifmedia to determine the link type to emulate in tun?
I think it's silly to have tun and ethfoo in the tree... and I think
ethfoo is a bad name for something that's not merely an example.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----