Subject: Re: Moving ethfoo in the main tree
To: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Quentin Garnier <email@example.com>
Date: 12/13/2004 16:54:03
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 04:46:00PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 10:33:28AM +0100, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I believe my ethfoo device has reached the point where it is useful
> > enough (notably with qemu) it could be in the main part of tree, rather
> > than a not built LKM. There are a few points I need to address before
> > that, though.
> BTW, I didn't try it nor read the source, but what do you get on
> the emulator side ? Only the payload of the ethernet frame, or the comple=
> frame ?
> In the case of an emulator, I guess we want to read/inject a complete
> ethernet frame.
A complete frame. That's what the emulator expect (as it emulates a NE2000
Quentin Garnier - email@example.com - cube@NetBSD.org
"Commala-come-five! / Even when the shadows rise!
To see the world and walk the world / Makes ya glad to be alive."
Susannah's Song, The Dark Tower VI, Stephen King, 2004.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----