Subject: Re: [email@example.com: Re: Moving ethfoo in the main tree]
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/13/2004 14:42:51
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:16:14PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> >Using bridge(4) over two ethfoo(4) should work. It's actually an
> >interesting test to do, I'll try that by tonight.
> >Making it possible for ethfoo to do bridging would introduce a lot of
> >complexity (it would have to know a lot about Ethernet).
> If "manual" bridge setup via bridge(4) would work, that'd be absolute ok.
> I have no idea what simh-vax does to get this all going.
simh-vax on NetBSD uses bpf, and can't talk to the host machine, which is
why I always wanted to have something like ethfoo instead.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----