Subject: Re: Ideas on the audio framework
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: TAMURA Kent <kent@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/11/2004 20:31:32
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Dec_11_20:31:28_2004-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII


> > i have one concern about removing the current 6 mulaw functions
> > and replacing them wih almost certainly slower sequences of
> > functions?  the platforms that matter are likely those that
> > will never need anything but these (eg, sparc.)
> 
> Now that you mention it, me too. I'd like to see a benchmark on a slow
> machine at a high sample rate.

Ok, I'll show a benchmark result. (or a benchmark program?)

-- 
TAMURA Kent <kent_2004 at hauN.org> <kent at NetBSD.org>


--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Dec_11_20:31:28_2004-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUAQbrak37t9398iwLqAQLg3wgAkduSBitkQqOOnVm09KYgNSU+OCZHl9jW
oyj+eBVaxx3uuiN6CioVyc19kRXFuTyASukfbpKLJHQRYXsaAPKD/aCYmviD00cd
h1PT6nIDo4Tb2ueJ3eq5deEydj7YwGCVMmH4Y6g6uqpIDhM4xgQlDbA6h0vfeing
yyprPA2ukuWpwIbmGirHEvTP/J/dZaZtz+WOgEnut2bFEL9T7HFavRp3j9ZtBPz6
kV6iJh9GsRw//hqeeKO7wSUD/jiipFkDF1LJTmYZWbJbquYMaUn28tvo42VABYPH
5r2XBSsNcCVtM8ckMriGYSyh5zpw6N/8wRaFJlFDErYQC2z0/VOIUw==
=84so
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sat_Dec_11_20:31:28_2004-1--