Subject: Re: Jail For NetBSD
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Sascha Retzki <email@example.com>
Date: 12/10/2004 15:26:24
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:30:36PM -0500, Jed Davis wrote:
> Sascha Retzki <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:43:52AM +0100, "Nils O. Sel?sdal" wrote:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >Is what it exist an equivalent of jail in NetBSD ?
> >> >thank You
> >> If anybody isn't working on 'jail',
> >> what about private namespaces ? (Plan9 style),
> >> would be massivly more powerful, and not a
> >> bad hack like Jail is.
> > Hm, sounds great. How hard is it to implement :) ?
> It helps that, under Plan9, the interface to the network stack (and,
> well, everything else) is defined entirely in terms of simple
> filesystem operations. Somehow, I can't see NetBSD redesigning
> everything along those lines.
Yeah, and plan9 is microkernel based, and they are not unix(tm), and so on
and so forth.
> (let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
> ((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l)))))) (lambda
> (f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
> (C k))))))) '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))