Subject: Re: Jail For NetBSD
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jed Davis <email@example.com>
Date: 12/08/2004 18:30:36
Sascha Retzki <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:43:52AM +0100, "Nils O. Sel?sdal" wrote:
>> >Is what it exist an equivalent of jail in NetBSD ?
>> >thank You
>> If anybody isn't working on 'jail',
>> what about private namespaces ? (Plan9 style),
>> would be massivly more powerful, and not a
>> bad hack like Jail is.
> Hm, sounds great. How hard is it to implement :) ?
It helps that, under Plan9, the interface to the network stack (and,
well, everything else) is defined entirely in terms of simple
filesystem operations. Somehow, I can't see NetBSD redesigning
everything along those lines.
(let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l)))))) (lambda
(f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
(C k))))))) '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))