On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:15:19PM -0500, Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> writes:
> 
> > I don't think that'd be a good idea. If you're using pthread.h, you're 
> > using libpthread, not threadlib.
> 
> threadlib.h is a bad hack. Why the "obvious" solution I suggested
> yesterday didn't occur to any of us when I did this in the first place
> isn't clear to me, but I'm in favor if implementing it and causing
> threadlib.h a swift death.

	I must have missed it.  What's the "obvious" solution?
(I don't see it in the mail-index archives either)

eric