Subject: Re: Unicode support in iso9660.
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 11/23/2004 07:41:30
> It would handle it fine yes. I thus think that UTF-8 (wich supports
> upto 32+ bits chars) would be fine for this.
I've seen this said before in this thread (that UTF-8 supports 32-bit
RFC 3629, the latest UTF-8 spec I find, disagrees; it does not support
anything above 10ffff (though it could go as high as 1fffff without too
much trouble, if I'm reading it right, and could be extended to greater
widths in a tolerably obvious way).
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B