Subject: Re: representation of persistent device status, was Re: devfs, was Re: ptyfs...
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@dsg.stanford.edu>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/19/2004 16:56:26
--UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 02:56:05PM -0800, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> In message <20041119224802.GA11093@netbsd.org>, Bill Studenmund writes:
>=20
> [...]
> >Well, the main goal for devfs is to make major and minor numbers be
> >transient. So there's no way that old-style nodes in the fs will work.
>=20
> hi Bill,
>=20
> To return for awhile to the question which prompted the ptyfs -> devfs
> topic switch, and answer your question of a week or so back:
>=20
> I know of certain applications where old-style nodes in the fs is an
> absolute, non-negotiable requirement, and for which the proposed devfs
> is an absolute non-starter.

How in the world can the application tell if it's an old-style node or a=20
new one? They both stat as block or character nodes... ???

You also haven't explained how the proposed devfs doesn't work.

Take care,

Bill

--UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBnpY6Wz+3JHUci9cRAm9WAJ9YIjdF7VSPAqxvngMYu/ZfORz1WgCcDDDF
A61mNI+Usfj7coVSxW2zyIA=
=9vt1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6--