Subject: Re: Unicode support in iso9660.
To: None <>
From: Martin Husemann <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/19/2004 09:37:26
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 09:32:06AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
>  - the current cd9660 code is plain stupid wrong for the non-joliet
>    case (should just pass out the stream of bytes, just like ffs)

After reading this again it occured to me that this is difference to what
I said before: it's "just dump bytes" vs. "convert to valid utf-8 (or
similar) - which means knowing how to interpret it first hand".

That's the point?