Subject: Re: representation of persistent device status, was Re: devfs, was Re: ptyfs...
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 11/18/2004 22:15:37
> On the issue of namespaces, in one view of a "full devfs", even
> having major,minor numbers as a namespace at all should go away, or
> at least become a historical distraction. The device *is* the vnode
> in the devfs.
I think that would be a mistake. I've too often had occasion to have
device files in unusual places in the filesystem. (Not all that often,
but often enough - maybe a half-dozen times in the two-plus decades
I've been a sysadmin.) Some of those could be handled with multiple
mounts of devfs, but some couldn't really. I think it would be a major
step backwards to lose the ability.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B