Subject: Re: bug in netinet6/ipsec.c?
To: Greg Troxel <email@example.com>
From: Jonathan Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/27/2004 16:13:04
In message <20041027225354.457EE1FB5@fnord.ir.bbn.com>,
Greg Troxel writes:
>That diff looks good to me, and a similar change in netinet6/ipsec.c
>is in order.
>I don't understand your comment about 'should never get here' and
>REQUIRE; I think this is a simple coding error and nothing more.
See sys/netinet6/ipsec.c rev 1.97 -> 1.98. There may a good
motivation for the change, but it doesn't leap out at me. Itojun, can
you explain the rationale, please?