In message <20041027225354.457EE1FB5@fnord.ir.bbn.com>,
Greg Troxel writes:

>That diff looks good to me, and a similar change in netinet6/ipsec.c
>is in order.

Thanks. Done.

>I don't understand your comment about 'should never get here' and
>REQUIRE; I think this is a simple coding error and nothing more.

See sys/netinet6/ipsec.c rev 1.97 -> 1.98.  There may a good
motivation for the change, but it doesn't leap out at me.  Itojun, can
you explain the rationale, please?

[...]