--RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 02:31:23AM +0200, Peter Postma wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:27:11PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 12:01:14PM +0200, Peter Postma wrote:
> > Other than that, the only other thing I think you should do is address =
the=20
> > used/refcnt question. I'm not 100% sure what the best thing to do is.=
=20
> > While I think refcounting would be good, the question is how are the=20
> > references added & deleted. If an LKM can say, "I depend on this LKM,"=
=20
> > then they make a lot of sense. Otherwise, it's probably better to leave=
 it=20
> > as a used flag for now.
> >=20
>=20
> I've already committed it, sorry.

Uhm, that was quick. Did you really not want comments? :-)

In the future, please think about how someone will look at any given=20
change you make and the comment you attach to it, and thus figure out why=
=20
you made it. By merging different changes together, it's hard to figure=20
out why any given line changed. I realize I've muddled stuff before, and=20
probably everyone else has. Just please think about it in the future.

> I'll change the 'refcnt' back to 'used', then it should be ok..

Don't bother. I made the comment assuming you hadn't checked it in yet.=20
Leave it as-is.

Take care,

Bill

--RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBfZ1wWz+3JHUci9cRAm2+AKCC1sQYxWO7cAodXEl7ulppfDItxgCdEwQ5
Ado9YqcsvtC96jNIMJEa77g=
=Ddcz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4--