Subject: Re: FIONWRITE proposal
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 10/13/2004 20:58:41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Oct 13, 2004, at 5:56 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Why is "number of bytes which have not yet been 'sent'" the right
> semantics, as opposed to, say, "number of bytes that you can
> immediately write"?
> The latter would definitely more akin to the write side of FIONREAD,
> as far as I know...
That is what I originally suggested to Bill... but what do you do for
regular files? Return INT_MAX? 0? EOPNOTSUPP?
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----