Subject: Re: Work-in-progress "wedges" implementation
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/24/2004 18:43:47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 05:26:09PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2004, at 6:52 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
> >When this happens, it is going to be even more important than it is
> >now to solve one of the current problems we have on NetBSD (maybe
> >other systems do as well).
> I appreciate everyone's comments on wedges so far. Thanks! Keep them=20
> coming! :-)
No problem. And thanks again for working on this. As evidenced by the=20
number of posts I've made, I'm very excited by this work. :-)
> I agree, a better approach to device identification is needed. I plan=20
> on dredging up my devfs ideas again once wedges is in and a little more=
> useful, because I think a devfs is the right way to solve these issues.
Agreed. I think it may help to note what issues we expect devfs to solve=20
well, so that folks object less for now, however we can leave the details=
Also, since we are now getting very active about locators, my main devfs=20
and wedges concerns are going away (mainly that if you set permissions on=
something that it keeps those permissions even if it moves around).
> However, I want to try and keep those issues separate from wedges, for=20
> now... I believe wedges can be useful even before we solve world=20
> hunger. I also think it's important to have a lot of people looking at=
> / working on the code.
> In any case, I plan on checking in my work-in-progress tonight.
Cool! I'm working on a module to read Apple partition maps.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----