Subject: Re: emul vs. symlinks
To: <>
From: David Laight <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/15/2004 17:24:47
> I think that keeping two copies of namei is a bit ugly. Why don't we make
> relative symlinks?

They (almost certainly) take longer to process  - and someone was
worried about a single test in the namei code.....

I agree that two copies of ANY function is a bad idea - there are far too
many duplicated functions already...


David Laight: