Subject: Re: mfs woes
To: Steven M. Bellovin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Wojciech Puchar <email@example.com>
Date: 07/14/2004 21:04:04
>> "hard drive." I do not want to keep volatile information on the former;
>> I cannot keep it on the latter.
> You and Andrew make good points about special cases. I should amend my
> suggestion: does MFS make sense for /tmp on ordinary machines?
IMHO not. mostly because on ordinary machines /tmp traffic isn't high.
and if it is - /tmp partition mounted async is better