Subject: Re: mfs woes
To: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/14/2004 21:04:04
>> "hard drive."  I do not want to keep volatile information on the former;
>> I cannot keep it on the latter.
>>
> You and Andrew make good points about special cases.  I should amend my
> suggestion: does MFS make sense for /tmp on ordinary machines?
>
IMHO not. mostly because on ordinary machines /tmp traffic isn't high.
and if it is - /tmp partition mounted async is better