Subject: Re: mount_nfs, ISO and PR bin/1472
To: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@NetBSD.org>
Date: 06/28/2004 18:38:05
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:06:34 -0700
Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Can anyone see any reason to keep the ISO code in there?
> I'd say either just go with 'C', or go with 'S' but leave the ISO code
> there. i.e. if you do that latter and someone defines ISO, then they
> will have a compile break to fix.
> I'd say leave the ISO code. Since it's ifdef'd it doesn't hurt. Plus,
> someday I think we should get the ISO code running (if only on two
> machines on the same subnet).
As it turns out, christos already added the port functionality a
different way. I didn't notice that the PR was closed.
Looks like the man page could use an update though. I will look at
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@NetBSD.org>