Subject: Re: P1003_1B_SEMAPHORE in GENERIC ?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/25/2004 01:25:15
In article <20040624204422.GA4532@antioche.eu.org>,
Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com> wrote:
>the cause of lib/25897 and lib/25898 is that P1003_1B_SEMAPHORE isn't
>defined in the sparc GENERIC kernel config file.
>Any objections if I add it to all GENERIC kenrels which don't have it,
>and request a pullup to 2.0 (after a test-compile, of course) ?