Subject: Re: Non executable mappings and compatibility options bugs
To: Chuck Silvers <email@example.com>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/21/2004 09:55:17
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:55:23AM -0700, Chuck Silvers wrote:
> it would be safest to default to making everything executable for other
> emulations until it can be verified that those binaries work ok with
> non-executable mappings. this seems fine to me.
I strongly disagree; this would be a regression, with no warning to the
user, in system security. Adding a COMPAT_ option shouldn't punch a giant
hole in a fundamental security mechanism.
If nothing else, both config and the kernel at boot time should print
warnings about this.