Subject: Re: MBUFTRACE, m_claim() usage?
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Jonathan Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/16/2004 10:30:26
In message <E1BX3VG-0000rSemail@example.com>Jonathan Stone writes
>Another style nit: when there's an m_foo() mbuf function and an MFOO()
>macro, MFOO() is usually an inline version of m_foo(). On those
>grounds, how about renaming m_claim() to m_claimm(), as it walks an
>entire chain doing MCLAIM() on each mbuf?
Since nobody said anything, I propose to go ahead and rename m_claim()
to to m_claimm(), for consistency with MFREE()/m_free()/m_freem().
To ease future maintenance, i will make sure hte change works on
the NetBSD 2.0 branch, then request a pullup.