Subject: Re: MBUFTRACE, m_claim() usage?
To: None <>
From: Jonathan Stone <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/16/2004 10:30:26
In message <>Jonathan Stone writes


>Another style nit: when there's an m_foo() mbuf function and an MFOO()
>macro, MFOO() is usually an inline version of m_foo().  On those
>grounds, how about renaming m_claim() to m_claimm(), as it walks an
>entire chain doing MCLAIM() on each mbuf?

Since nobody said anything, I propose to go ahead and rename m_claim()
to to m_claimm(), for consistency with MFREE()/m_free()/m_freem().

To ease future maintenance, i will make sure hte change works on
the NetBSD 2.0 branch, then request a pullup.