Subject: Re: NetBSD kernel "underbelly" testing
To: Ben Elliston <bje+dated+1085566922.83af9c@air.net.au>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/21/2004 09:04:43
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 08:21:58PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> I've an interest in helping to develop a kernel testsuite for NetBSD.
> I've spoken to Luke Mewburn about it and he thinks it's worth
> discussing on this list, so here it is :-)
>=20
> I've been giving thought to testing the kernel using a virtualisation
> system like Xen.  If we presuppose that NetBSD, being so portable, has
> a minimum amount of machine dependent code, we can get a good
> approximation for all NetBSD ports by testing NetBSD/xen on a Xen
> system.  This would involve modifying Xen so that the behaviour of the
> underlying virtual hardware could be manipulated by a scriptable
> interface.
>=20
> Tests could be scripted such that a variety of hardware events could
> be triggered and the kernel's response to these tested (eg. disk
> errors, bus timeouts, etc).
>=20
> Any comments?  Is this worth pursuing?

Sounds interesting.

Take care,

Bill


--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAriibWz+3JHUci9cRAnsrAJ9Nlg/gaHr663F/TT29/vu5B09aHgCfaz/8
HvJiybeLwEZzelRHVrLYc8E=
=R9LZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--