On Mar 31, 11:02am, enami@sm.sony.co.jp (enami tsugutomo) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: statfs, statvfs and friends.

| christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
| 
| >         int64_t   f_bavail;             /* free blocks avail to non-superuser */
| 
| I'd like to have equivalent always non-negative value field like # of
| reserved blocks for super user, and deprecate the use of f_bavail at
| least in our tree.

Ok, f_breserved, and f_freserved?

| >    2b. Q: X/Open says we should use unsigned long for bsize, frsize and
| >           fsblkcnt_t for the rest. Should we do that?
| >        A: I say keep the types as I have them.
| 
| do `the rest' includes f_bavail?

Yes. fsblkcnt_t is signed I believe. (I will check again).

christos